Jump to content

Talk:Fishnet

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Fishnet (material))

Shouldn't "Fishnet tights" redirect here? That is after all a common usage.

Image

[edit]

Is there any other image available, preferably one that is less sexual? It's obvious why some people think Wikipedia makes soft pornogrpahy available, if we examine the unnecessarily sexual images sometimes used (e.g. the image in pantyhose for men)--71.111.194.50 (talk) 13:19, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 I second that opinion.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.228.227.133 (talk) 19:38, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply] 

It has been my observation (and I think a more popular observation) that fishnet stockings are firstly recocognised as a classic feminine vintage style of hosiery (sometimes with attributes of fetish); more so than a look related to Punk or Gothic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.61.182.124 (talk) 17:51, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fishnet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]