Talk:Florida-class battleship
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Florida class battleship)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Florida-class battleship article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Florida-class battleship has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 20, 2009. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the American Florida-class battleships were the first U.S. battleships equipped with a steam turbine propulsion system? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated A-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]- This review is transcluded from Talk:Florida class battleship/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Preliminary comments
[edit]- You say that the Floridas were improved over the Delawares, but how?
- Convert the displacement in the infobox. I've always liked the convert|LT|MT template myself, but that's just me.
- Consider using the main gun's designation in the main body. Mark 5 or whatever it was.
- Did these ships have the usual problems with casemated guns mounted too low for operations in heavy seas?
I'll be offline for a couple of weeks beginning on the 19th, but I think we can get through this if you've got the time. If not I'll put it on hold until I get back. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 08:10, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks Sturmvogel. I fixed the first three points; neither Hore nor Conway's say anything about the casemate guns being particularly wet (for comparison, both mention the problems the Iron Duke-class battleships had with their casemates in heavy seas - the first ship I could think of that had this problem). I haven't seen anything elsewhere (for instance, the DANFS articles) to that effect either. Conway's does say that the preceding Delwares had problems with their secondary battery being very wet. Parsecboy (talk) 13:29, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
- All the casement based secondaries in US Battleships were very wet according to my sources which was why they were moved up to the main deck. Friedman cites that the forward sections in the Florida class were very wet. Tirronan (talk) 00:43, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Warfare good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles that are good articles
- A-Class Operation Majestic Titan articles
- Operation Majestic Titan articles
- A-Class Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I) articles
- Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I) articles
- A-Class military history articles
- A-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- A-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- A-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- A-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- A-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles
- Successful requests for military history A-Class review
- A-Class Ships articles
- All WikiProject Ships pages
- A-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- A-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject United States articles