Jump to content

Talk:Fort Fisher

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

The link to Smith Island in the "Cape Fear River" section goes to a disambiguation page, but I can't tell which Smith Island is the correct one. Gmarsden 01:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Largest Amphibious Landing Prior To WW II?

[edit]

The article doesn't give the size of Union ground force. Was this really the largest amphibious landing (of US troops) prior to WW II? Was it larger than Scott's amphibious landing at Vera Cruz ? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Veracruz

Perhaps it was the largest opposed amphibious landing of US Troops prior to WW II.

Tashiro (talk) 02:46, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative image

[edit]

I have recently uploaded this colour lithograph of a painting by Julian Oliver Davidson, perhaps mistakenly identified as "Capture of Port Fisher" rather than Fort Fisher. It may also pre-date the image currently featured in the article and may be more suitable as a main image, particularly if a derivative is created which is cropped of printer's marks. Cheers (talk) 21:16, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Fort Fisher. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:49, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]