Talk:Fort Meade

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fort Meade article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States: Military history / Superfund / Government Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Military history - U.S. military history task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Superfund (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. Government (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Mass surveillance Low‑importance

	Fort Meade is within the scope of WikiProject Mass surveillance, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of mass surveillance and mass surveillance-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.Mass surveillanceWikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillanceTemplate:WikiProject Mass surveillanceMass surveillance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Correction and Detention Facilities (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Correction and Detention FacilitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesTemplate:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesCorrection and Detention Facilities articles

Cryptography: Computer science Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

http://www.ftmeade.army.mil

Merging pages?

I agree with having the two Fort Meade pages merged. If written well with clear sections there should be no confusion. Adavidb 15:44, 1 November 2006 (UTC) Makes sense, they are one in the same. Navyteacher86 12:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if it is such a good idea. One is for the census, and the other is the base itself. Others have themselve seperated: see Fort Belvoir, Virginia and Fort Belvoir. I think it would be better to leave them seperate. Radagast83 17:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hundreds of census-designated places were made into new Geography/Demographics pages in October 2002 by Ram-Man as a way of populating Wikipedia. I don't believe this history in itself justifies leaving these pages separate from others regarding the same locations.Adavidb 08:01, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe we should merge these pages...CDP's are completely seperate entities in discussion from military instalations and should be treated as such. Wrightchr 19:25, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Do those who advocate separation of the information have reason to believe the geography/demographics data from the CDP does not correspond with that of the military base? (Why is it considered so separate?) Adavidb 03:22, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think keeping them separate would be a good idea. A military base is not the same thing as a CDP. — Matt Crypto 14:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The CDP in question covers the same military base. Why not combine the information? It's only about geography and demographics. Adavidb 15:07, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

These should definitely be merged IMO. Since both articles cover different aspects of the same thing, they can seamlessly be combined. Others that have been combined include Fort Rucker, Fort Greely, Fort Bragg, and Fort Knox. --GregU 19:00, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a problem with merging the two pages. The postal adress for the town of Fort Meade includes non-military addresses off the base that have nothing to do with military other than perhaps a large military clientele, schools for example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.150.35 (talk) 16:18, 24 March 2013 (UTC)‎[reply]

County?

What county of Virginia? 76.218.100.214 (talk) 21:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Meade is not in Virginia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.137.150.35 (talk) 16:18, 24 March 2013 (UTC)‎[reply]

More specifically, Ft. Meade is located in Anne Arundel County, Maryland. Scarletsmith (talk) 09:04, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Meade exit signs

Here are some freeway exit signs for Fort Meade

Baltimore Washington Parkway: Here

WhisperToMe (talk) 20:26, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

NSA Headquarters Missing

Even the article for the NSA http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Agency it is quite clear that the NSA has a notable installation here. There's even a photo of it on this article. So, is there a specific reason it's not included? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shoobe01 (talk • contribs) 00:06, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template issue

I think one template needs to be removed as Fort Meade is in the Baltimore, and not the Washington, metropolitan area. I will remove it and I am open to any further objections. Heegoop 14:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort George G. Meade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111111173532/http://www.ftmeade.army.mil/pages/history/history.html to http://www.ftmeade.army.mil/pages/history/history.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:08, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Fort George G. Meade. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120913080426/http://www.dinfos.osd.mil/Dinfosweb/History.aspx to http://www.dinfos.osd.mil/Dinfosweb/History.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:39, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]