Talk:Gerrards Cross Tunnel

Gerrards Cross Tunnel was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 23, 2011	Good article nominee	Not listed

Trains: in UK Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	October 24, 2017

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject UK Railways (assessed as Mid-importance).

Engineering

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Buckinghamshire (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles

Requested move

Gerrards Cross tunnel collapse → Gerrards Cross Tunnel — This article covers the tunnel in general and the accident. The lead could be reworked to show this. Simply south...... 23:33, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support Thryduulf (talk) 14:10, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support: just be bold and get on with it! --RFBailey (talk) 05:08, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Any additional comments:

I'm a bit 'meh' about this either way to be honest. When I first wrote the article I was only really bothered about how the collapse happened and what they did afterwards. Since then it's grown a bit so it's a bit more about the controversy over the Tesco store. One thing would be that if the title is changed, things like the section headings would also need changing otherwise it might look a bit odd. Quantpole (talk) 16:48, 17 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That can easily be fixed. --RFBailey (talk) 05:09, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yep - I wasn't meaning it was a problem to the proposed move. Like you say above I'd be happy for it just to be got on with. No point in a WP:RM unless it's likely to be controversial. Quantpole (talk) 09:05, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed---only now we're stuck waiting for the 7-day period to expire before doing anything..... --RFBailey (talk) 03:57, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be bold and end early, seeing as nobody's likely to object. Simply south...... 20:36, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HSE report

Just to let people know, but the HSE report still hasn't been released. I have found some info from a FOI request which seems to indicate that tje investigation is ongoing. The HSE also seem to have employed David Nethercott (head of civil engineering at Imperial) to be their consultant on the matter ([1]). Quantpole (talk) 12:06, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For info: The HSE report has been released due to a successful FOI Act request. A copy can be found here. Mjroots (talk) 18:21, 28 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gerrards Cross Tunnel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:51, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cost and compensation

How much did the incident cost Chiltern Railways and Network Rail? How much compensation did Tesco pay and was it offered willingly or was there a legal battle? 83.104.249.240 (talk) 15:53, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]