Jump to content

Talk:Great Appalachian Storm of 1950

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

too many categories?

[edit]

There are categories for 18 states. Isn't that a wee bit extreme? Maybe at this point Category:natural history of the United States be sufficient? Circeus 19:31, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, it pales in comparison to other articles, both within and without the meteorology porject. If there was a category for Natural History for the region of the Great Lakes, Ohio Valley, Mississippi Valley, and East, it would reduce the total number by 14. This article's number of categories is well shy of the highest number on wikipedia (something like 54, I believe). Thegreatdr 20:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
54? That's definitely a job for Category:Natural history of the United States, no questions! Maybe a regional division is needed, like that used in Category:Flora of the United States? Circeus 01:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the problem is that the TOC box blanks a large part of the screen. Can someone tweak it to allow the text to wrap up the side?JodyB talk 02:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Great Appalachian Storm of November 1950. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:55, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]