Talk:2015 Guatemalan general election

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Results table: Spanish names and acronyms of parties[edit]

In my opinion the addition of the Spanish names and acronyms of parties in the results table is helpful (or even necessary). While there is a en.wp convention to use English translations in the article titles, the parties' original names (proper names!) are in Spanish, some of them are difficult to translate, various translations circulate (Renewed Democratic Liberty, Democratic Freedom Revival, Renewed Democratic Liberation) and some of the parties are usually refered to by their acronyms (which may – my speculation – rather be backronyms: LIDER ("leader"), UNE ("unites"), CREO ("believe"), VIVA ("live")). To a reader without previous knowledge, it may not be obvious that a "Líder" party of which they may have heard or read, is identic with "Renewed Democratic Liberty". Therefore it is beneficial to readers to add the Spanish names and acronyms. In my view the consequent loss of compactness and legibility (as @Number 57: has argued) is minimal and acceptable. --RJFF (talk) 13:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't believe it is helpful to have them in the table. The acronyms are already explained in one of the sections directly above the results table. If this isn't enough, in almost all cases the link is there to click through to the articles on the parties if anyone is confused by who they are. In contrast, it's my opinion that any benefit gained from adding translations and acronyms to the table is far outweighed by the negative effect on the legibility of the table caused by adding them (it exactly doubled the width of the Congressional results table, which is particularly unhelpful for those viewing on narrow screens - i.e. smartphones). Number 57 13:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Guatemalan general election, 2015. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:51, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]