Jump to content

Talk:Hallucination (song)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 06:18, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

This one shouldn't take long at all! --K. Peake 06:18, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead[edit]

  • Keep the note in the infobox so it is know this was on the streaming version only, but add (deluxe) after the album title
  • "British band Years & Years. It was included on the" → "British band Years & Years from the"
  • "and wrote it with" → "and served as a co-writer with"
  • Imany should not be linked twice in the lead; either do it on the first occasion or the second, depending on whether the reference or her being mentioned by name is more important
  • ""Hallucination" is a 80's-inspired" → "it is a 80's-inspired"
  • Pipe four-on-the-floor to Four on the floor (music)
  • "with its lyrics" → "with the lyrics"
  • "received widespread acclaim" → "received generally positive reviews" per the body
  • "lyrics, nature as well as" → "lyrics and nature as well as Years & Years's"
  • Are you sure the link on Commonwealth of Independent States is needed?

Background and composition[edit]

  • "and wrote it with" → "and co-wrote it with"
  • Pipe four-on-the-floor to Four on the floor (music)
  • Again, should Imany be linked on the first or second instance?
  • Why have you written that it contains an interpolation when all the sources mention a sample?
  • "all of its facets." → "all of the facets."
  • [10] has no usage after the quote; shouldn't you invoke [6] instead since that mentions it like [9] does?

Reception[edit]

  • Any thematic order here for the reviews?
    • I restructured the reviews, are you fine with it? Iaof2017 (talk) 13:21, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Wyspa.fm source uses the word flawlessly, rather than unabashedly
  • "writing that "['the song'] is a perfect track" → "writing that it "is a perfect song" per the source's wording
  • Are you sure the link on Commonwealth of Independent States is needed?
  • Mention that the position in New Zealand was on the New Zealand Hot Singles Chart
  • "as well as number 28 on" → "and number 28 on"

Promotion[edit]

  • Per both being one para, couldn't you merge this with the above section and retitle to Reception and promotion?
  • "For promotion, an accompanying music video for" → "For promotion, a music video for"
  • What do you mean by overview of the latter and where is the part of the sentence after the comma sourced?
Removed. Iaof2017 (talk) 13:01, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not sure if you should use the term "observers" when only one source is invoked
  • Italicise Black Mirror
  • Italicise Squid Game
  • Przemysław Kokot's surname should only be used since you introduced him previously
  • "to an 1980s-inspired" → "to an 80s-inspired" per the source's wording

Track listing[edit]

  • Shouldn't the track listings for the original and remixes be separated?

Charts[edit]

Weekly charts[edit]

  • Are you sure Commonwealth of Independent States should be linked?
  • Remove Dance/Mix Show Airplay per WP:USCHARTS

Monthly charts[edit]

  • Good

Release history[edit]

  • Good

Notes[edit]

  • Good

References[edit]

  • Copyvio score looks decent at 38.7%
  • Why does ref 6 cite New Musical Express instead of just NME when that is what the publication is called nowadays?
  • Remove or replace ref 10 since that is an unreliable source owned by Universal
  • Cite Promo News as publisher instead on ref 29
  • Only cite BBC on ref 32 with the wikilink
  • WP:OVERLINK of TopHit on ref 42

Final comments and verdict[edit]

  •  On hold until all of the issues are fixed! --K. Peake 07:55, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hey @Kyle Peake: thank you for picking up the review. I've responded to all of your concerns above. Cheers! Iaof2017 (talk) 13:07, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Pass now, top job on this! --K. Peake 08:18, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]