Talk:Hart Island/GA1

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: John M Wolfson (talk · contribs) 03:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm User:John M Wolfson, and I'll be your reviewer. Looking through each of the criteria:

Well written: This is pretty outstanding prose, IMO. I see no major errors in that regard, nor do I find any MOS violations. Y
Verifiable/No OR: I'm going to need citations for the following statement:
- Also known as "Hart's island"
- Easternmost point of the Bronx
Broad in coverage: Works pretty well in that regard. Y
Neutral: I think it would be better to put some opposition the Department of Corrections might have to making it easier to access for families (re the Hart Island Project), or at least their response.
Stable: I see no vandalism in the past 50 edits. Y
Illustrated: All images are free and appropriate. Y

On the whole this is a pretty good article. -John M Wolfson (talk) 03:58, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

John M Wolfson, thanks for the review. I added references to the two statements you pointed out. I'm adding opposition now. epicgenius (talk) 15:49, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a few sentences about opposition, and the status of the bill. epicgenius (talk) 16:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Both of my concerns have been allayed, and I now pass Y this article. Congratulations, User:Epicgenius. -John M Wolfson (talk) 18:05, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]