Talk:Instituto de Cultura Puertorriqueña/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 22:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 22:31, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Linkrot: None found. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:32, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- The prose is very poor throughout. This artcile should have been copy-edited before being nominated. It does not meet WP:GACR criterion #1 "reasonably well written". The grammar is very poor and some sentences are pretty much meaningless.
- The lead does not summarize the artcile. Please read WP:LEAD.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- I have tagged several apparently POV statemenst which need attributins and citing.
- The bulk of this article is sourced to the Institute itself. This is not accptable. we need more reliable third party sources.
- In fact the majority of the article appears to be a direct copyright violation or close paraphrase of {http://www.icp.gobierno.pr/}
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- One third part source used for a minor point, the rest is lifted from the organization's own website.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- See note above.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- This article is a long way away from from teh standards outlines at WP:GACR. You need to find some good third party reliable sources, then re-write removing all copyrighted material. Then get it copy-edited and ask for a WP:Peer review. When all of that has been done and all points have been addressed, renominate if you wish. Jezhotwells (talk) 22:52, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: