Talk:Invincible-class battlecruiser/GA1
GA Review[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jackyd101 (talk) 11:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC) Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- "although it must be said that the" - remove "it must be said that as it is redundant.
- Double check the use of HMS and SMS as it is currently inconsistently used. Also make sure that all ship names are properly italicised.
- There is a problematic convert template in the Battle of Jutland section.
- Link Admiral Horace Hood in the Jutland section.
- Put the last paragraph of Jutland into a sub-section of its own as it deals with the last five years of the battlecruiser's careers, not the battle itself.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references):
- "Gardiner and Gray" - I'd rather you named the publication, although it is not essential.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- Is it recorded how many casualties were casued by Inflexible's mine explosion?
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
- a (fair representation):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- a Pass/Fail:
Thankyou and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. I had a few other comments, but lost electricity at a vital moment and couldn't remember all that I had written. However, none of them was too important. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 11:48, 11 November 2009 (UTC)