Talk:It's Only Rock 'n Roll

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Rock music Mid‑importance

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Rolling Stones Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject The Rolling Stones, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Rolling Stones on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.The Rolling StonesWikipedia:WikiProject The Rolling StonesTemplate:WikiProject The Rolling StonesThe Rolling Stones articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

The Title Is Wrong. Only one apostrophe

If someone wants to shake that admin off his high horse and bring him round to fix it, it would be appreciated. Stan weller 21:38, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CIVIL --Mel Etitis (Talk) 08:43, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

quite civilly: the title is indeed wrong - it's It's Only Rock 'n Roll and should be moved. are there any objections? Sssoul (talk) 21:49, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

agreed, it should be moved. 24.163.24.248 (talk) 00:50, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It seems you don't need an admin for that. This talk page used to redirect to Talk:It's Only Rock an Roll; I cloned that page over to this one (Talk:It's Only Rock 'n Roll) and reversed the redirect (Talk:It's Only Rock an Roll now redirects to Talk:It's Only Rock 'n Roll). --Patronanejo (talk) 08:10, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:IORNRCover.jpg

Image:IORNRCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:09, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MICK TAYLOR PERCUSSION

WHAT SONG DID MICK TAYLOR PLAY CONGA ON???? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.21.61.25 (talk) 16:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Luxury" and "Time Waits for No One." Stan weller (talk) 19:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Concerning this article: The article is higly informative, well written and easy to read for all of us non brittons. Thank you for this!! Lill-Ann (talk) 22:09, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:It's Only Rock 'n Roll/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)

Press [show] to view →

All the start class criteria

Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
Y At least one section of prose (excluding the lead section)
Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
Y Categorisation at least by artist and year
Y A casual reader should learn something about the album. Cavie78 (talk) 15:36, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article requirements:
Y Start: reasonably complete infobox; lead section with overview of album; track listing; reference to at least primary personnel by name; Categorization by at least artist and year.
Y C: all of start and (1) cover art in infobox; (2) at least one additional section of prose; (3) track lengths & song authors in tracklist; (4) a personnel section including all musicians.

B: all of C and (1) most technical details in infobox; (2) technical personnel in personnel section; (3) no obvious issues with sourcing; (4) no obvious issues with readability, though it may not conform completely to style guidelines; (5) no glaring omissions of information (see some suggestions at WP:ALBUM) or extraneous information, like trivia.
Higher Classes are not assigned by WikiProject Album. Please review "the perfect article" and, if already B class, consider seeking additional feedback from Wikipedia:Good articles or Wikipedia:Featured articles.

Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment for additional information on article class. To request a reassessment from the Album project, when concerns are addressed, please see "requesting an assessment".

Last edited at 22:51, 22 November 2010 (UTC). Substituted at 19:12, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on It's Only Rock 'n Roll. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080408104153/http://www.rollingstones.com/discog/index.php?v=a&a=1&id=10 to http://www.rollingstones.com/discog/index.php?v=a&a=1&id=10

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update section?

In the release and reception section, it should be updated. “As of 2006, "Till The Next Goodbye," "Time Waits For No-One," "If You Really Want To Be My Friend" and "Short and Curlies" had never been played live.” Any diehard fans here know if this is still the case that these songs haven’t been played live yet? TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:24, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]