Talk:John Douglas (English architect)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 20:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Review

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A comprehensive, wide-ranging article, very easy to read and to assess.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   Well and appropriately Illustrated.

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Well and appropriately Illustrated.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   This is a fine example of what a GA-article should be, comprehensive, easy to read and easy to assess. Possibly an FA-class article, but I can only award GA.Pyrotec (talk) 21:17, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations on the article, it is well deserving of a GA-class.Pyrotec (talk) 21:17, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Wow! Thanks. Peter I. Vardy (talk) 22:25, 5 June 2009 (UTC)