Talk:Joseph Hansen (historian)

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 27 November 2018 by reviewer RoySmith (talk · contribs).

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

History

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Questions Regarding A Source: Lamothe-Langon[edit]

I don't yet have a strong opinion on whether Lamothe-Langon materials are real or invented. In general, it seems easier to copy than to create. I would like to understand his motive for inventing additional material with his history already running to 3 volumes. Graphomaniac? Maybe. I tend to trust Hansen as a guide thru the medieval and appreciate his consistent attempts to provide original source materials. Translating Hansen into English with added footnotes to discuss various sources would seem to have been a good contribution to the scholarship of this field in the 1970s. Lewismr (talk) 20:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]