Talk:Kielder

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

North East England Low‑importance

	North East England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Agreement[edit]

I agree with the proposal. As a local resident it is important that there is clarity with the identity of Kielder.

Kielder is the village.

Kielder Forest is the forest

Kielder Water is the larger of the two reservoirs

Kielder Water & Forest Park is a"tourist" entity

Kielder should therefore have its own entry

Cranecleugh (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 16 January 2019[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) feminist (talk) 00:49, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kielder, Northumberland → Kielder – No need for DAB per WP:UKPLACE and WP:PRECISION, the other 2 items refer to the village, aren't called just "Kielder" and are linked at the top of the article anyway to the DAB page isn't needed. Crouch, Swale (talk) 13:27, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). -- Flooded with them hundreds 09:26, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment if this is moved, the dab page probably should move to Kielder (disambiguation), for simplicity of access -- 70.51.201.106 (talk) 06:57, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There were a handful of misspellings "Keilder", which I have fixed (I checked in case it was an archaic or alternative spelling, but it seems not). We have the redirect Keilder Forest, which I have tagged as {{R from misspelling}}, but only that. Perhaps we should create the R Keilder, because if you type "Keilder" in the search box the only result is for the forest. 62.165.227.102 (talk) 07:00, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support but move Kielder to Kielder (disambiguation), some DAB entries were added by 70.51.201.106 since the request. 62.165.227.102 (talk) 07:13, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I still don't think the DAB is needed but that's now something for AFD, not RM since the deletion is now controversial. So we can move the DAB as proposed and debate deleting it separately. Crouch, Swale (talk) 07:36, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support as clear WP:PTOPIC. The DAB page is needed: it contains 6 other topics, of which the railway station will be known simply as 'Kielder', and from my personal knowledge Kielder Forest is sometimes called just Kielder. Narky Blert (talk) 11:06, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.