Talk:Lima and Callao Metro
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Grammar, etc.
[edit]Could someone please correct the article so that the English is actually understandable? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.100.218.59 (talk) 13:45, 18 August 2010 (UTC)
more lines
[edit]as stated by Mayor Luis Castañeda Lossio there will be six more lines added to the metro system. Construction has already started for the second line, Callao-Ate .
- Construction hasn't begun for the second line, it's still a project awaiting aproval. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.41.238.147 (talk) 17:00, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
public operations
[edit]Hello. I cannot understand if Lima metro has run in public operations only a few days since its opening (as my magazine says, which is confirmed by some websites), or if it is running every sarturday and sunday since jan 2004, as this website says. I don't read spanish at all, which is a big issue since most talk about it is in spanish. Thanks in advance for any information about this. Freewol (talk) 13:15, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
File:Metro de Lima Gente.jpg Nominated for Deletion
[edit]![]() |
An image used in this article, File:Metro de Lima Gente.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests July 2011
|
A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs.
This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:14, 27 July 2011 (UTC) |
Opening date?
[edit]Since a user has (re, I think)-added the dubious tag to the 2011 date of commencement of operation of the Lima Metro, yet it has not been discussed here yet, I thought I would bring it up. The English wikipedia page indicates its opening as 1990, however provides no reference for this (in fact it appears that Alan Garcia celebrated the opening of the line for political reasons to boost himself in the next election, despite the fact that it was not completed, and by all accounts I have seen, not operating commercially at this time). The Spanish wikipedia states that the inauguration was July 11, 2011, which is clearly confirmed by this reference. Further, this source clearly states that after Garcia's "opening" in 1990 the line was only used to offset transit strikes or for special events (they use the example of a wedding), and states that it was not operated commercially. Two other sites railway gazette and Urbanrail report that it has operated commercially sporadically since 2002, but its full commercial opening only happened in 2011. As such I propose that the opening date be left as 2011, but with a note (much as what we have for the Beijing Metro) saying that the line was opened by Alan Garcia in 1990 operating on special occasions, and since 2002 operating commercially sporadically. Or words to that effect. Thoughts? Ravendrop 01:26, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
- You are correct in all your affirmations, say it begun in 1990 could be misunderstood, in a massive and constant way it started in 2011 as a trial period and continue working until today already in commercial operations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpcea00 (talk • contribs) 21:32, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
Line colours ?
[edit]Tabletop (talk) 12:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
Voltage ?
[edit]Lima Metro uses overhead electrification, but what voltage?
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Lima Metro. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.perupress.com/2011/04/11/tren-electrico-tendra-el-viaducto-mas-largo-del-mundo/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306030148/http://economia.terra.com.pe/noticias/noticia.aspx?idNoticia=201004081700_ADN_78885716 to http://economia.terra.com.pe/noticias/noticia.aspx?idNoticia=201004081700_ADN_78885716
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140111001839/http://www.perupress.com/2011/04/11/tren-electrico-tendra-el-viaducto-mas-largo-del-mundo/ to http://www.perupress.com/2011/04/11/tren-electrico-tendra-el-viaducto-mas-largo-del-mundo
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110224223942/http://www.aate.gob.pe/Nuevo%20portal/lared.html to http://www.aate.gob.pe/Nuevo%20portal/lared.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140531162407/http://www.consorciometrodelima.com.pe/ to http://www.consorciometrodelima.com.pe/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Move & Required Cleanup
[edit]I have just moved this page from "Lima Metro" to be more precise & match with other Wikis, especially the Spanish language one.
There is now a significant amount of cleanup that has to happen, the least of which is changing the name throughout the article. Looking at previous topics above, it seems that for at least 12 years this page has been in desperate need of a thorough cleanup. Let's try to finally get that done in 2023. SSR07 (talk) 14:26, 3 August 2023 (UTC)