Talk:List of UK singles chart number ones of the 1990s

List of UK singles chart number ones of the 1990s is a featured list, which means it has been identified as one of the best lists produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 2, 2009	Peer review	Reviewed
January 31, 2009	Featured list candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured list

Lists

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Songs

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Record Charts Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Charts, a group of Wikipedians interested in improving the encyclopaedic coverage of articles relating to Record charts. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.Record ChartsWikipedia:WikiProject Record ChartsTemplate:WikiProject Record ChartsRecord Charts articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Dunblane massacre#Musical tributes|Dunblane]] The anchor (#Musical tributes) has been deleted by other users before.
[[Dunblane massacre#Music|Various Artists]] The anchor (#Music) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

On 12 March 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 1990s to List of UK singles chart number ones of the 1990s. The result of the discussion was moved.

Break up into smaller tables by year?

It might be helpful for navigational purposes to split the one huge table into ten smaller ones, so it is easier to sort through and also easily identify the number-ones for each year as well as the entire 90s decade. Thanks. --Wolfer68 (talk) 02:33, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The problem with that of course is that it would destroy the sorting functionality of the list...... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:46, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dates don't consist

I've just noticed that some of the dates on this article and the articles relating to the individual songs don't consist - particularly some of the 1999 ones. This would be worth investigating, I think. As this has been a featured list I'm assuming the dates on here are correct. Any thoughts? TheRetroGuy (talk) 15:05, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't checked but some of them might be week-ending dates rather than the day the chart was announced, as I'm sure the week-ending date is used in some sources. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 16:38, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense I guess and explains why the articles don't appear to be consistent. The one in particular I noticed was The Millennium Prayer which appears to have a combination of week beginning and week ending dates in the succession box (4 December 1999 having been a Saturday and, in which case, the end of the week that began on 28 November). However, the article says the song was at #1 for twe weeks, suggesting that if it was succeeded by Westlife on Sunday 19 December the date it reached the top should be 5/11 December. I'll check this out when I get a chance. TheRetroGuy (talk) 19:26, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As the editor who got this article to FL status, I can confirm that it uses the date when the song actually got to number 1, i.e. the Sunday when the chart was announced. Originally it used "week ending" dates but I got told to change this during the FLC. I'll go back through and double check they're all correct, though.... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:45, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It would be more correct to show the day the chart was announced rahter than week-ending date (of the chart). An example: Believe (1998 best-selling single by Cher) is a new entry at the top of the Chart on 25 October 1998 (the week-ending date when singles have been already sold and the chart is announced) and NOT on 31 October 1998 (the week-ending date of the current chart) as this list is mistakenly showing. My thesis is confirmed on the official chart website. We should fix all dates of this list. --Morbius (talk) 20:25, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The official charts are NOT using week begining here https://www.officialcharts.com/chart-news/all-the-number-1-singles__7931/#1990s DanTheMusicMan2 (talk) 18:46, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Number ones running over the new year.

There really should be a rule as to where these are placed. For example, I Will Always Love You got to #1 on November 29, 1992, and therefore was #1 in 1992 (therefore should be placed in 1992), however, it wasn't beaten until February 7, 1993, and therefore, it was also #1 in 1993. The way I think of it, there are two ways we could go about it two ways -- have the #1 in the year that it became number 1 (i.e. 1992), UNLESS the date it became #1 is December 29 or later in the year, and therefore the majority of that week would be in the new year, and it could be placed in 1993 or whatever the year is: For example:

Artist	Single^{[nb 1]}	Reached number 1^{[nb 1]}	Weeks at number 1^{[nb 1]}
Chef	"Chocolate Salty Balls (P.S. I Love You)"	27 December 1998	1
Steps	"Heartbeat / Tragedy"	3 January 1999	1

Because the week beginning December 27, 1998 was mostly in 1998 (5 days in 1998, 2 days in 1999), it is placed in 1998, however: Consider this:

Artist	Single^{[nb 1]}	Reached number 1^{[nb 1]}	Weeks at number 1^{[nb 1]}
Elvis Presley	"It's Now or Never"	3 November 1960	8
Cliff Richard & The Shadows	"I Love You"	29 December 1960	2

Note how although I Love You reach number one on December 29, 1960, the majority of that week was in 1961 (in this case, only 3 days out of 7 were in 1960). Otherwise, if you put the #1 in the year it reached number 1, then, if it was say #1 for about 7 weeks, and became #1 on 31 December, and was knocked off on 18 February the following year, then putting it on the year of the 31 December would be somewhat pointless since it'd would've only been that year for literally 5 hours as of the #1 being announced, and pretty much an entire 7 weeks in the next year.

The OTHER way, is to split it up so that it has 5 weeks from November 29, 1992 - January 3, 1993 in the 1992 section, and as the first #1 in the 1993 section, as 5 weeks from January 3 - February 7, 1993, like this:

Artist	Single^{[nb 1]}	Reached number 1^{[nb 1]}	Weeks at number 1^{[nb 1]}
Whitney Houston	"I Will Always Love You"	29 November 1992	5
Artist	Single^{[nb 1]}	Reached number 1^{[nb 1]}	Weeks at number 1^{[nb 1]}
Whitney Houston	"I Will Always Love You"	3 January 1993	5
2 Unlimited	"No Limit"	7 February 1993	5

--The Ultimate Koopa (talk) 18:10, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The most logical thing seems to be to list the number one under the year it first made number one (there are no exceptions like majority of week in a year etc.) It is simple, clear cut and I've implemented it. Hopefully that solves the problem. Rambo's Revenge (talk) 14:58, 29 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Whatimlookingfor.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Whatimlookingfor.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests September 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 18:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:List of number-one singles (UK) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 19:30, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dates

Every date on here is out by a week compared to the source? What is that all about? WilliamF1two (talk) 15:23, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed dates to match OCC, which is always the Saturday at the end of the week. A couple of No.1's move onto the next year, which again matches the OCC years. I know we all listen to the chart on Sunday, but it is always dated the following Saturday - check the Official charts page. This is consistent with the pages for 1980s and 1970s. Other pages should be made to match this and I will work forward through the decades.Btljs (talk) 22:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Adverts selling hit records

Perhaps in the lead we could also mention a good few of these number ones were hits because they had featured in television advertisements? "Should I Stay or Should I Go", "Young at Heart", "Inside", "Spaceman", "Flat Beat", and to extent "Bombastic" (all of these bar "Young at Heart" were Levi's adverts) If I am not mistaken this hadn't happened before the 1990s.--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 03:02, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'd Like to Teach the World to Sing (In Perfect Harmony) 1971, was from a Coke advert before it was actually a hit at all. I Heard It Through the Grapevine was used in a Levi advert in 1985. There have been a fair few hits that didn't quite make number 1 as well like When a Man Loves a Woman, Wonderful World, Piece of my Heart etc. and not forgetting the Stranglers' Always the Sun (just kidding). Btljs (talk) 07:35, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah OK. I just thought it could be of note still because it only happened twice before. There was also "The Joker" in 1990 as well.--TangoTizerWolfstone (talk) 17:27, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There were noticeably more songs from advertisements and films, particularly at the beginning of the decade. Late 1990 has "The Joker", "Blue Velvet" by Bobby Vinton, "Take My Breath Away" by Berlin, "Show Me Heaven" by Maria McKee and "Unchained Melody" by the Righteous Brothers pretty much all in the chart at the same time. I think it's in part due to low sales during this period. GNU/Andrew (talk) 15:59, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Artists by weeks at number 1

Section is OK, but please get rid of the flags. This isn't Eurovision. Btljs (talk) 14:48, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 1990s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100317142924/http://www.theofficialcharts.com:80/faq.php to http://www.theofficialcharts.com/faq.php#whocompiles

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 18:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 1990s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theofficialcharts.com/faq.php
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110726000000/http://www.ifpi.org/content/library/international-award-levels.pdf to http://www.ifpi.org/content/library/international-award-levels.pdf
Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/61DmdedGq?url=http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/search.aspx to http://www.bpi.co.uk/certifiedawards/Search.aspx
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theofficialcharts.com/stats-million_sellers.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:55, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 1990s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:58, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 1990s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 22 external links on List of UK Singles Chart number ones of the 1990s. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:56, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Clash / Big Audio Dynamite II

Multiple sources state that the "7 re-issue of "Should I Stay or Should I Go" also came with Big Audio Dynamite's "Rush" as AA printed on it. So that means it's a double hit, right? I know that CD singles were more popular in the '90s than vinyl, but that technically does make both songs a hit. Can anybody clarify this? ChewNaChunkx (talk) 17:00, 4 September 2019 (UTC) Looks like a B-Side to me not a double a side to me DanTheMusicMan2 (talk) 18:48, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Fatboy Slim

The caption at the side of the article says "Fatboy Slim achieved commercial success in the 1990s, with several hits prior to his only number one single". However, Fatboy Slim's real name is Norman Cook, and so he was also #1 in 1990 with Beats International and in 1986 with The Housemartins. Maybe it would be clearer if this stated it was his only *solo* number one? GNU/Andrew (talk) 15:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, and I've changed the caption accordingly. Richard3120 (talk) 22:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:UK Singles Chart which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 19:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Cite error: There are <ref group=nb> tags on this page, but the references will not show without a {{reflist|group=nb}} template (see the help page).

[nb 1]