Talk:List of booksellers' associations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Cooperatives (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cooperatives, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CooperativesWikipedia:WikiProject CooperativesTemplate:WikiProject CooperativesCooperatives articles

India[edit]

Recntly Authentic delhiuser, added the "Delhi State Booksellers and Publishers Association" entry in a new section for india, in a new section, which they created. In the process Authentic delhiuser deleted the heading for Asia, perhaps by mistake. StarryGrandma reveted these edits with the edit summary "India is in Asia". She then added a sub-section for India under Asia, and added "Federation of Publishers' and Booksellers' Associations in India" to it. Authentic delhiuser then edited again, replacing the FPBAI entry with an entry for the DSBPA. Both the DSBPA and FPBAI entries were sourced to their own websites. Both appear to exist. I have therefore restored the DSBPA entry while retaining the FPBAI entry, and formatting the DSBPA cite with {{cite web}}. I also removed the phrase "(First book organisation of India)" as uncited puffery (the DSBPA does not appear to so describe itself on its site with this phrase). Hsving both entries seems the proper response here. If anyoe thinks differently, please indicate your reasons in this section so they can be discussed, rather than having an edit war. DES ^(talk) 13:40, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DESiegel, that seems to be the best way to handle it. Most of the entries are for country level organizations, but there are some that are more local. StarryGrandma (talk) 17:27, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome, StarryGrandma. A State-level assocation, particularly the capitol state, seems reasonable. Many Indian states are larger in both area and population than many countries, after all. DES ^(talk) 17:46, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of booksellers' associations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120919205024/http://bookweb.org/index.html to http://www.bookweb.org/index.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120323030817/http://www.naiba.com/index.html to http://www.naiba.com/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]