Jump to content

Talk:List of brachiopod genera

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Found possible citiation however source appears to be in Russian(?)

[edit]

This source appears to be about fossils and mentions the fossil that requires a citiation on this wiki article. However as mentioned the source is in Russian and I can't deciefer it. But I thought I'd leave it here if it helps http://mmtk.ginras.ru/pdf/Manuals&Classica/1987.Iskopaemye.izvestkovye.vodorosli.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hanikb (talkcontribs) 03:11, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't the only link that links to something completely irrelevant. Many of the links are faulty. The whole page needs reviewing! --95.146.180.32 (talk) 21:05, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

....Christianella given as one of the brachiopods links to a plant! Can somebody look into this? Prashanthns (talk) 18:33, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've disambigged the link. Abyssal (talk) 03:17, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Section unnecessary

[edit]

The lengthy section on naming conventions and terminology is unnecessary and has little to do with the purpose of the page, which is simply to provide a list of brachiopod genera, and should be removed. The information there should be found by linking to the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature.

JM (talk)

extant genera

[edit]

Extant genera aren't actually bolded as the lead section indicates. --69.211.137.87 (talk) 06:38, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then bold them! :D Abyssal (talk) 11:55, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
and so I did. dwergenpaartje

Disphenia

[edit]

Disphenia redirects to Cyathea, which is also a plant.

I am not qualified to review the list of genera, but I do know that a type of palm tree is not also a type of shelled marine animal. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utgardsloki (talkcontribs) 16:14, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's been fixed.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  05:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Isogramma

[edit]

The link to this genus leads to a page about moths. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.240.28.26 (talk) 13:40, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  05:32, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]