Jump to content

Talk:7 World Trade Center (1987–2001)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Potential Bias

[edit]

Is there some very good reason that this article completely ignores the 4 year university study done at UAF by Hulsey et al[1], and acts like NIST is the only authority to refer to? Please justify such apparent bias. The NY Post certainly thinks that this study is noteworthy enough to mention, dedicating several paragraphs to it in a general article about WTC7[2]. This wiki article as it currently stands fails to meet the criteria of WP:NPOV without at least mentioning that the UAF study exists, and came to a radically different conclusion than NIST: "The principal conclusion of our study is that fire did not cause the collapse of WTC 7 on 9/11, contrary to the conclusions of NIST and private engineering firms that studied the collapse." Alamosta (talk) 16:17, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:World Trade Center (1973–2001) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 05:36, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the discussion page for this article?

[edit]

Is this article a recent move/merger? Can you direct me to the archive for the prior article if so, please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinekonata (talkcontribs) 15:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]