Jump to content

Talk:Voyage of the Space Bubble

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Looking Glass (series))

Comments

[edit]

According to the man himself, ( www.JohnRingo.net , "Re: What Could be the name of the 5th book?", John Ringo, 4 November 2010 ) the editors changed his selection of book titles

  • Tum-Tum Tree to Claws that Catch. (Which was supposed to be Book Nine.)

Just to be clear, the PLANNED titles in the series are...

  • The Tulgey Wood
  • Eyes of Flame
  • The Borogroves
  • The Jub-jub Bird
  • The Bandersnatch
— John Ringo

76.66.203.138 (talk) 07:07, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Requested move 06 August 2014

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:25, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Looking Glass (series)Voyage of the Space BubbleWP:NATURALDIS, use a title with an undisambiguated form in place of one that needs disambiguation 65.94.169.222 (talk) 07:46, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

[edit]
Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Discussion

[edit]
Any additional comments:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Merge suggested

[edit]

I suggest a merge of Voyage of the Space Bubble with Into the Looking Glass. Only the first book has an individual article, and it makes sense to make just one article for the series. Michael-Zero (talk) 13:42, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]