Jump to content

Talk:Lyrical abstraction

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Lyrical Abstraction)

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 04:15, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Lyrical abstraction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:14, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lyrical abstraction. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider

[edit]

It is well documented that Seery is one of the pioneers of Lyrical Abstraction. There have been two museum expositions solely about Lyrical Abstractionism. The 1971 Lyrical Abstraction Show at the Whitney and Expanding Boundaries: Lyrical Abstraction at the Boca Raton Museum of Art in 2009. Seery was in both of these exposition. In fact, it was a Seery that was the highlighted for the Boca Raton exposition.

Peter Schjeldahl, considered one of the most influential art critics today, called Seery “the most exciting abstract painter of the 70s” Schjeldahl, along with others, are quoted naming Seery as one of the pioneers of Lyrical Abstractionism.

While Hoyland is a well know abstract artist, he has not nearly received this level of acknowledgment as being a pioneer of Lyrical Abstractionism.

Given these facts, I think it justified to move Seery, a well documented pioneer of Lyrical Abstraction to a spot at the top article and replace an artist that does not have the same recognition as a part of this art movement.

It should be noted that this is not a major edit in that no images are being removed or added, only repositioning images that already exist on the page. AppassionatoDiSport (talk) 16:17, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestion, the imagery is fine as is, The Seery is well placed, as is the Landfield, Willis, Lipsky, and Hoyland (who all had important exhibitions in NYC at the Emmerich Gallery and other important galleries and museums during the late sixties, early seventies). In fact Landfield, Willis, Lipsky, and Hoyland have all had many dozens of solo exhibitions in museums and important galleries over the last 50 years...Modernist (talk) 23:11, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Modernist for your consideration and answer. Much appreciated and I respect your decision. AppassionatoDiSport (talk) 15:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]