Talk:MIKTA

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 January 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal MIKTA is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Turkey Low‑importance

	Turkey portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Turkey, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Turkey and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TurkeyWikipedia:WikiProject TurkeyTemplate:WikiProject TurkeyTurkey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Nigeria is not Korea

But it seems that Nigeria's figures in the Statistics section are Korea's... 7th in HDI?, 4th in car production?

Saludos! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.79.47.238 (talk) 13:49, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Correct! I will change this. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 15:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because...

The subject of the articole is real. MIKT are cited by various journals, such as EAST (East Asia Strategies) and various source on the web: http://seekingalpha.com/article/247492-mikt-another-bric-in-the-making http://ftalphaville.ft.com/blog/2011/01/17/460756/brics-mikts-and-oneills-lucrative-lexicon/ http://complexindulgence.blogspot.com/2011/01/mikt-is-new-brics.html

I'm affraid the probelm came from the fact that I was not able to ad a proper reference list even if a added a reference. This maily because is my first day on wikipedia and I'm still a "newbe". I would be looking forward to hear from any more experienced wikipedian how to avoid this problem in the future.

Best regards FGM

I have my doubts - the 3 refs shown all date back to January 2011 and speculate whether MIKT will become a term like BRIC. The apparent total lack of Google news hits since then suggests that the term never caught on. PamD 09:21, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Odd statistics

As I can see, values in statistics are wrong or misplaced — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.174.54.100 (talk) 00:32, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MIKTs or MINTs

There is no independent mention to the term MIKT or MINTS outside this Wikipedia article. All the comments, articles and links provided - most importantly those referring to O'Neill only refer to MINTs - Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria and Turkey. There is no reference to South Korea as part of this group of countries. I welcome clarification/new references from the OP before I begin editing the article to more accurately reflect the research and links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ajisekanla (talk • contribs) 13:03, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ajisekanla, indeed you are right! I will fix this problem. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 15:24, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Page title

All of the reliable sources I have seen only refer to MINT, not MIKT. I have copied over to MINT countries the main MINT content from this page. A Google search for MIKT does not produce any reliable results. I suggest that we build a consensus on turning this page into a re-direct. (Heroeswithmetaphors) talk 16:16, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's why there really should be no page on MIKT. They all appear to be the same variant...did O'Neill make up MIKT, MIST and now MINT? MINT is the only one that provides results, and we should merge this page with MINT. Viller the Great (talk) 02:04, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]