Jump to content

Talk:Magnum P.I. (2018 TV series) season 3/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 12:50, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

[edit]
  • Infobox looks good.
  • "also become a co-showrunner" → "also became a co-showrunner"

Cast and characters

[edit]
  • No problems here.

Episodes

[edit]
  • "Rick, T.C. and Katsumoto" → "Rick, T.C., and Katsumoto"
  • The sentence "Meanwhile, Higgins expresses concern after a first date with her surgeon that he is 'too perfect,'" needs rewording.
  • "Magnum and T.C." → "Magnum, and T.C."

Crossovers

[edit]
  • "early 2020 numerous actors" → "early 2020, numerous actors"

Production

[edit]
  • "who also co-developed the series and is an executive producer for the series" → "who also co-developed and executive-produced for the series".
  • "start date.[31] September 14, was later" → "start date;[31] September 14 was later"
  • "on the set crowd" → "on the set, crowd"
  • A better, secondary source is needed for Kurt Jones joining the series.
  • "Roger E. Mosley who portrayed" → "Roger E. Mosley, who portrayed"
  • "Dennis Chun who" → "Dennis Chun, who"
  • Remove the space in-between the two references after "introduced in the first season".

Marketing and release

[edit]
  • "Blue Bloods" links to a disambiguation page. Fix the link to Blue Bloods.

Viewing figures

[edit]
  • This section looks good.
  • Some +7 ratings are already available here.

References

[edit]
  • Using this tool, or doing it manually, archive all archivable sources (citations from the Futon Critic can be archived using this).

Overview

[edit]

GAN table

[edit]
GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    c (OR):
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):
    b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

Overall:
Pass/Fail:

· · ·

Notes

[edit]
Just now remembering I forgot to archive references, I'll get to that in the morning. TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:13, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Sorry it took me so long, IABot was down this morning, everything has been archived so that should address all of your concerns. Thanks, TheDoctorWho (talk) 23:28, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]