Talk:Make in India
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Make in India article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Zero Defect Zero Effect was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 15 May 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Make in India. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
We are not a free webhost
[edit]We are not a free webhost for Make In India to redistribute their promotional propaganda. If no third parties have covered it, we do not go into such minutia. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:03, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
Addition of Sectors
[edit]- Why some editors are against adding sectors to this article??? This article is about make in India and there should be info regarding various sectors. --Human3015 03:15, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- because we are writing an encyclopedia article, not reproducing the make in india website. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- The main problem is that it's simply way too much information for an encyclopedia article. You could summarize it by saying that 100% FDI is now permitted for companies in many sectors while other sectors allow lower foreign investment, down to 26% in certain sectors. Source that to the sectors page mentioned in your post. Ravensfire (talk) 03:25, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
@Ravensfire and TheRedPenOfDoom:, currently im just mentioning all sectors with incentives, can we make a chart instead?? --Human3015 03:53, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Ravensfire and TheRedPenOfDoom:, I modified the "sector" subsection, if you have something to say lets discuss. I summarized the whole long earlier article as you people directed earlier. Each sector have provided reference. Do you have anything to say regarding arrangement or else?? --Human3015 05:44, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
- it is still entirely primary sourced regurgitation of promotional content. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 03:20, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- @Ravensfire and TheRedPenOfDoom:, Why you are reverting without making consensus here? why you think that its promotional?? Text already mentions that in defence 49% FDI is allowed, and 100% in railways, why you are not deleting that?? Ravensfire is also agree with this. This is best version we can have. If you still have problem, lets go to admin's dispute, you can't revert well sourced and well written material. --Human3015 04:24, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- @TheRedPenOfDoom:, just now User:Spirit of Eagle also edited same section for spelling, he/she don't have problem with it. What you alone have problem? You can take it to admin but don't revert it. I think involving admin in this issue will be a best option. Its sourced and well written material. --Human3015 04:34, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- I just checked the spelling using a live spellcheck tool. This does not mean that I endorse the content, only that I corrected the spelling of a single word. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 05:07, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- @TheRedPenOfDoom:, just now User:Spirit of Eagle also edited same section for spelling, he/she don't have problem with it. What you alone have problem? You can take it to admin but don't revert it. I think involving admin in this issue will be a best option. Its sourced and well written material. --Human3015 04:34, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
- Article already mentions how much FDI allowed in defence and railway sector in text, I just wrote how much FDI allowed in other sector too. Thats it. --Human3015 05:42, 16 April 2015 (UTC)
Merge proposal
[edit]- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- The result of the discussion was to move Make in Maharashtra to a section in Make in India. AdityaChanana (talk) 23:32, 12 January 2017 (UTC)
I propose to merge Make in Maharashtra into this article as a section since its a state version of mainn scheme of central govt. -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 13:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
- Support - Make in Maharashtra can be merged with Make in India article under a new section Make in Maharashtra. Merging will help this article in its expansion. — Sanskari Hangout 15:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Make in India. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150814032017/http://www.makeinindia.com/sectors/ to http://www.makeinindia.com/sectors/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:54, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Purpose and Objectives of "Make In India"
[edit]Although the aims of "Make In India" are known through the widespread debate, discussion and reports on its implementation and efficacy, there is no mention of it in this Wikipedia article. Including a section on the Purpose and Objectives of "Make In India" will lend much greater clarity to the overall picture and also provide necessary underpinning to the other information in the article. 112.196.166.217 (talk) 15:29, 16 May 2017 (UTC)