Talk:Maternal–fetal medicine

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women's Health C‑class Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's Health, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's Health on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HealthWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HealthTemplate:WikiProject Women's Healthwomen's health articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

My plans for this page

I’m hoping to expand this article in the coming days (April 5th through the 8th) by:

adding a lead section, picture, and info box
2. including a history of the development of this specialty
3. refining spectrum of care
4. adding relevant international organizations and common journals

In addition, I plan to increase the links to other wiki articles, and provide more external links/further reading.

I had initially planned to change the name to “perinatology”, but google ngram viewer seems to show that the term “maternal-fetal medicine” has overtaken “perinatology” in recent literature. Any feedback is more than welcome! Fairlycromulent (talk) 19:00, 1 April 2016 (UTC)fairlycromulent[reply]

Requested move 12 April 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved per WP:MOS. En dash is harder for readers to type is not an issue as there will be a redirect anyway. (non admin closure) Insert CleverPhrase Here 06:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maternal-fetal medicine → Maternal–fetal medicine – En dash, not hyphen 123.243.76.165 (talk) 05:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC) 123.243.76.165 (talk) 05:26, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose en dash is harder for readers to type making it harder to directly access this article. --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:31, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support - from MOS:HYPHEN and MOS:DASH, I think the two terms maternal and fetal are independent of each other, and should be separated by an en-dash, not by a hyphen. Per In some cases, like diode–transistor logic, the independent status of the linked elements requires an en dash instead of a hyphen. LT910001's oppose argument is not very persuasive, as ease or otherwise of typing the name is not a factor in choosing WP:ARTICLETITLE. The current name would in any case remain as a redirect. — Amakuru (talk) 09:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.