Talk:Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Minerva logo.gif
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Minerva logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 17:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Cross-linguistic Linked Data project
[edit]There's nothing at Cross-linguistic Linked Data project that can't be covered here. It's not at all clear that the project has any independent notability at all; the one source refers to it simply as a collection of databases. If our coverage of it later becomes so extensive that it is out of proportion here, a split can be considered. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
- I agree for the time being. Redirect to the respective section in the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History would be enough. --Pavlo Chemist (talk) 20:39, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
Update Suggested
[edit]![]() | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Suggesting an addition to "Present Day" to reflect Nicole Boivin's reinstatement as of December 2021. (See: https://www.science.org/content/article/archaeologist-accused-bullying-reinstated-max-planck-institute )
In December 2021, Boivin was officially reinstated as director of the Department of Archaeology by the High Civil Court in Berlin following an injunction against the demotion. [1]
Zeilstra A (talk) 12:54, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
References
- ^ "Archaeologist accused of bullying is reinstated at Max Planck Institute". www.science.org. Retrieved 31 January 2022.