Jump to content

Talk:Micromax Informatics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Micromax Mobile)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2020 and 6 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mavin2516.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:59, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Possible company representatives removing verifiable content

[edit]

User:Peunet and User:harmanbagga91 removing the content about this company being a rebranding mobile company.(information posted here is verifiable with various citations),But they deliberately deleting the text,Admin or Mods please review this matter.These users might be company representatives. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fonehacker (talkcontribs) 20:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Fonehacker:, please report such instances on the conflict-of-interest editing noticeboard, WP:COIN, and on the respective talk pages of articles. You may post a message on my talk page if you have any queries. -- Rohini (talk) 13:23, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Csd declined

[edit]

I have reverted to an earlier, tight, concise, non-spammy version of the article. Perhaps a company representative has been over zealous in adding promotional material. Dlohcierekim 01:13, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

more data

[edit]

I have tried to add more data regarding newer models specifications and current news but it looks a little too immature.edits are welcome. Apatheist (talk) 19:50, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit

[edit]

I think the references need tidying up, and more citations need adding. The main article has been copyedited into decent shape. If you add further text, and want it reviewing for grammar or style, please just add the copy edit tag back into the relevant section or to the top of the article. RuthLiv 23:42, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Cleaned up a bit

[edit]

This article is painful to edit. The references are making my head pain. I have tried to clean up a bit, but the main part is still left. I'm working on it, probably later. Added to watchlist.

PrajayXG (talk) 08:33, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Precautions to be taken while editing

[edit]

I suggest editors to take preventive precautions to improve the quality of the article Yohannvt (talk) 10:39, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Censorship by company representatives

[edit]

There are many articles with verifable sources are deleted . someone from micromax is probably "scrubbing" the wikipedia squeekly clean — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thatonewikiguy (talkcontribs) 10:56, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Thatonewikiguy:, please report such instances on the conflict-of-interest editing noticeboard, WP:COIN, and on the respective talk pages of articles. -- Rohini (talk) 13:21, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Micromax Informatics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:15, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Too much promotional content and immature style sentences

[edit]

This article is filled with little too much promotional content and unnecessary details and sections. Kindly see to that, many of the sections that should be updated with time, haven't been. Please see to the past dates in the article being mentioned in future. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aadarshashutosh (talkcontribs) 12:15, 16 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NDTV as a source

[edit]

@Azuredivay: what is your basis for saying NDTV is not a reliable source? I looked in the archives at WP:RSN and discussions of it have generally been favorable. - MrOllie (talk) 12:56, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lakh or crore?

[edit]

Can anyone give conversion for lakh and crore? Note that not everyone is well versed on that terms. Encik Tekateki (talk) 02:03, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]