Jump to content

Talk:Mono (mixtape)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Mono (RM album))

Mixtape vs. Album

[edit]

In ictu oculi, may I ask why you changed the to album? It's marketed as a mixtape and is labeled as such by the sources listed on the article. Commercial mixtapes are a thing and this was one of them, so I'm not sure how it being commercially released changes the fact that it's a mixtape. DanielleTH (Say hi!) 03:42, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Because it's a subcategory of album and there are other albums of this name. Per previous (mixtape) RMs. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:27, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 26 August 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. There is consensus that the proposed name is in line with the WP:ALBUMDAB guideline. (non-admin closure) — Newslinger talk 06:24, 12 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Mono (RM album)Mono (mixtape) – Per WP:ALBUMDAB: Use "(mixtape)" for mixtapes. According to third party reliable sources such as Billboard, The Korea Herald, United Press International, and Vulture, this is a mixtape. If there is a notable mixtape with the same title by another artist, Mono (RM mixtape) is fine with me. 221.187.107.208 (talk) 20:48, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

For similar past discussions, see Talk:Captured (mixtape)#Requested move 22 May 2019 and Talk:15 (mixtape)#Requested move 22 May 2019. 221.187.107.208 (talk) 21:26, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Fun fact #1. This writing was posted by an user years ago. It had no consensus and you abused it for moving pages to your preferred style regardless if disambiguation was required or not solely because the writing was ambiguous, you, of course, had no problem with it.
  • Fun fact #2. The current writing of WP:ALBUMDAB was built and rewritten with consensus, based upon the decisions of multiple RMs and RFC. Despite being built with consensus, as it prevents you from doing what you used to do, now you consider it "illegal". © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 19:15, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.