Talk:Mulan (2009 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema task force.

China: Cinema Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Chinese cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Requested move 26 June 2015[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 13:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mulan: Rise of a Warrior → Mulan (2009 film) – IMDB lists the film under the current title, but even the DVD cover art on IMDB has a different English title. As can be seen here, only the USA uses the current title. The UK uses 2 different titles, Mulan: Warrior Princess (DVD), and Mulan: Legendary Warrior. I do understand WP:Natural but with so many international titles, the current title just seems too US-centric. As far as I can tell, the film was not even screened in the US. The film's main box office came from Asia, and as can be seen from the Asian posters: China, Singapore, South Korea Thailand etc., it's all just "Mulan". --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 21:31, 3 July 2015 (UTC) Timmyshin (talk) 16:36, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. I am usually an advocate for WP:NATURAL but the current article title is too US-centric. A US-centric title may be suitable for an American film, but this is a Chinese film and obviously targeted mostly to Chinese audiences. Sovereign /^Sentinel 02:46, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:NATURALDAB. Calidum T|C 01:20, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. WP:SUBTITLE usually wouldn't apply here, but it's worth thinking about anyway. --BDD (talk) 18:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I note that this is simply reversing a previous and apparently undiscussed move 20:52, 18 July 2013‎ Film Fan (talk | contribs | block)‎ . . (38 bytes) (+38)‎ . . (Film Fan moved page Mulan (2009 film) to Mulan: Rise of a Warrior) and on the rationale provided by nom it seems a no-brainer to me, frankly. If WP:NATURALDAB really does provide a case for the current title (I'm skeptical) then we should fix WP:NATURALDAB rather than follow it in this case. Andrewa (talk) 18:08, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

"Mulan (film)"[edit]

The usage and topic of Mulan (film) is under discussion, see Talk:Mulan (1998 film) -- 67.70.32.190 (talk) 06:06, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]