Jump to content

Talk:Nepal house martin/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Very well written!
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Very well sourced, one of the better GA's I've read in a while.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    I learned a bit about this species I had never heard of before today, all bases are covered!
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    Although I'm not a big "image guy", if you want to move this up to FAC, you mighht want to consider a picture of the nest in that section, a minor point, but it could help the article, the ones on Commons didn't appear High-res enough to use as a thumbnail, so I didn't add one.
  7. Overall: Good job! I enjoyed doing this one!
    Pass/Fail:

Reviewer: Mike - Μολὼν λαβέ 00:59, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]