Talk:North Presbyterian Church

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles

Disambiguation

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Requested move (completed)[edit]

Request move from North Presbyterian Church (disambiguation) to "North Presbyterian Church". This will undo unhelpful move implemented by an editor. This was discussed with that editor at Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation#Disambiguation pages with all red links but one. This will undo the really weird decision to redirect from "North Presbyterian Church" to a differently named specific church, when it should be the disambiguation page. doncram (talk) 10:34, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment -- you need to raise the discussion of what the primary topic for "North Presbyterian Church" is at Talk:North Presbyterian Church first. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:43, 21 September 2008 (UTC) nevermind. Moving. -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:45, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Change of name is good since base name is not used ... when there are only two articles the recommended practice is to apply hatnotes rather than use a disambiguation page. However, since it seems likely that other articles may be written shortly, a dab page is ok with me. Abtract (talk) 11:50, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article was moved so no more discussion is needed. If anyone doesn't like that, it would require a new move request, and proper notice everywhere necessary. Thanks. doncram (talk) 01:24, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]