Jump to content

Talk:2011 OPERA faster-than-light neutrino anomaly

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:OPERA neutrino anomaly)

Former good article nominee2011 OPERA faster-than-light neutrino anomaly was a Natural sciences good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 16, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
November 20, 2011Good article nomineeNot listed
December 10, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 19, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that physicists running the OPERA experiment detected neutrino particles apparently moving faster than light?
Current status: Former good article nominee


End result

[edit]

Here is the corrected version, arXiv:1109.4897v4, submitted to JHEP. --D.H (talk) 19:31, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of that, D.H. Strebe (talk) 20:23, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of neutrino

[edit]

electron neutrino ν e, muon neutrino ν μ and tau neutrino

It's very important or the article is a stub — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.76.98.84 (talk) 06:07, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article states muon neutrino. Strebe (talk) 06:57, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

colocated or co-located

[edit]

In the last dozen edits or so, one "colocated" was changed to "co-located" and one "co-located" was changed to "colocated". Which is correct? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:16, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The dictionary says “colocated”.Strebe (talk) 06:24, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Faster-than-light neutrino anomaly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:47, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]