Jump to content

Talk:Olof Björnsson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Olof (II) Björnsson)

Not recognized officially as historical king

[edit]

Olaf is not recognized officially as a historically verifiable King of Sweden. His brother Eric is, as the very first such in succession up until today. SergeWoodzing (talk) 14:01, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Should the link to king of Sweden be removed? I have written a comment on the talk page for kings of sweden asking he be considered as an addition to that page. If not, then shouldn't the link be severed? Mellie107 (talk) 07:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was moved. --BDD (talk) 19:23, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Olof (II) BjörnssonOlof Björnsson – Superfluous and unnatural disambiguation. Early Scandivanians kings are not denotated by numerals, but by patronym or epithet. walk victor falk talk 01:19, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

His wife / Queen of Sweeden / Consort - Ingeborg Thrandsdotter

[edit]

His wife / Queen of Sweeden / Consort - Ingeborg Thrandsdotter was listed as a separate wikipedia article but it seems to have disappeared and links back here?

Why is is this?

Every King had to have had a queen and every queen had a King.

Their daughter is said to be this person, so these would be her parents. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrid_of_Sweden

Gyrithe Olafsdotter Adam 18:23, 5 January 2024 (UTC)


This was the link that goes to this page now for some reason? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ingeborg_Thrandsdotter — Preceding unsigned comment added by Atom888 (talkcontribs) 18:24, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We can assume that the separate article was not considered (sourced as) notable enough and/or that she is considered a fantasy character not an actual person. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 16:12, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As far as I can tell, there has never been an article under that particular name (see here). The redirect was created as such.
Andejons (talk) 12:31, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]