Talk:One Day

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:One Day (band))
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

One blue link per enty[edit]

Please stop adding extra links to the entries. Per disambiguation page guidelines--see WP:MOSDAB#Individual entries--each entry should have exactly one blue link. You can continue to restore these additional links, and I won't continue to revert you, but I will tag the page for cleanup, and another editor will remove them just the same.--ShelfSkewed Talk 06:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There Is One Blue Link[edit]

There is only one blue entries for each artist making it one blue for each one, so back off. It also gives the people the ability to go to the artist of said song and thats a lot better then typing the name of the artist just to see who they are, they should be able to just go automatically straight there. --Lilviikatemies (talk) 06:26, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The disambiguation-page guideline cited above says: "Each bulleted entry should have exactly one navigable (blue) link to efficiently guide users to the most relevant article for each use of the ambiguous term. Do not wikilink any other words in the line." For songs without articles of their own, this usually means linking to the album on which the song appears, or, if there is no article for the album, linking to the performer's article (as long as that article mentions the song)--but not to both in a single entry. If you disagree with this guideline, this is not the place to debate it. Instead you can open a discussion on the topic at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (disambiguation pages). But as long as the guideline is in place, there is no reason it should not be applied here.--ShelfSkewed Talk 06:32, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]