Jump to content

Talk:Operation Judgement (1945)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Citations

[edit]

Citations: to the contributor who thinks the citations should be reformatted: thank you for your contribution. The citations all work satisfactorily, but if you think they could be improved, please go ahead. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Historikeren (talkcontribs) 20:13, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article seems to have suffered from drive-by tagging. Is it OK to remove this? all the points made are included in the references - it just needs a little effort to check. If there are any points that are in doubt, please say which ones. Historikeren (talk) 09:28, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 04 July 2014

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. Jenks24 (talk) 07:12, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Operation Judgement, KilbotnOperation Judgement – Name only used by this article. Please move over the disambiguation page now moved to Operation Judgement (disambiguation) --Relisted. Armbrust The Homunculus 09:06, 11 July 2014 (UTC)  – P. S. Burton (talk) 10:46, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 12:34, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Addendum: Just to clarify; this page has been moved anyway (to a title disambiguated by date) with this edit in December 2014. (Note added by Xyl 54 (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2020 (UTC))[reply]

Aftermath

[edit]

I've re-written the Aftermath section, as the current version seemed to be suggesting the RAF were somehow at fault for attacking the U-boat base after Dönitz had "ordered the immediate cessation of all U-boat attacks on Allied shipping" and while the German crews "believed their war was over". In fact the U-boat war was still very much on, and it's clear from this that the Germans were acting in bad faith during this period. So I trust everyone is OK with that. Xyl 54 (talk) 19:44, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]