Jump to content

Talk:Paper Mario/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Any comments are welcome. LegoKontribsTalkM 04:39, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


Looks fine

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Has only 18 refs, but many are used more than once.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    All sources look reliable.
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    Talks about the game overall, not just the plot.
    B. Focused:
    Talks about the game, without straying.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
    Not an advert
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
    History looks clean
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    Would recommend using {{Non-free use rationale}}, but is fine the way it is.
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Looks great