Talk:Ascension Cathedral (Veliko Tarnovo)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: SMasters (talk) 09:35, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- Article is properly referenced with reliable sources and has no original research.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Article covers all major aspects and is focused.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Article complies to WP:NPOV.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Article is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Pictures are properly tagged and captioned.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall: This article is a well researched and written. I enjoyed reading it, and am confident that it meets all the requirements for a GA so I am happy to pass it. Well done. – SMasters (talk) 09:50, 25 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail: