Jump to content

Talk:Pet industry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Petconomy)

Requested move 14 December 2019

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page moved. (non-admin closure) Steel1943 (talk) 20:15, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


PetconomyPet industry – The proposed title is the common name of the topic. Petconomy is a neologism with no measurable usage in published books and only 7,100 exact-word Google results. In contrast, pet industry has some usage in published books and 975,000 exact-phrase Google results. Only one of the sources cited in the article, Inhapress, uses the term petconomy. If more reliable sources are found, we could include petconomy as a bolded alternative name in the first sentence. — Newslinger talk 19:38, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and move it, sez me. When this article was created I was surprised to find that we did not have anything already in place providing the contents, and what I looked for, naturally, was "pet industry". It is a far more descriptive title. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:56, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I wanted to give Dongil0324 and Epmdejong a chance to respond, since this article might be a student assignment according to the comments at User talk:Dongil0324 and User talk:Epmdejong. If there's overwhelming consensus to move the article, then feel free to close this discussion early. — Newslinger talk 20:04, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.