Jump to content

Talk:Pitești

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Piteşti)

Untitled

[edit]

Added a bit more detail on the Pitesti experiment and an external link (which should probably be formatted better). For flow reasons, I'd probably want the festival info ahead of the heavy history but when I tried to swap sections, the result was not aesthetic.

TMLutas

Crest

[edit]

There seems to be some confusion about the crests. The one displayed for the city is actually the one for the county, and the actual one can be found here (I can confirm that this is the case, since the Town Hall in the city, unlike its site, uses the small one with the falcon holding the flag. The first link also notes that the crest we use for the county (in the template, for one), is actually used by the County Council (don't know why they need a separate one, but they apparently feel it has a point...). Dahn 14:05, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cease fire

[edit]

I have now fully protected this page to prevent all editing for the next few days. I'm dismayed that none of the participants in this little edit war seem to have tried discussing things here, instead sniping at one another in edit summaries. The only exemption to the edit warring policy is reverting blatant vandalism. All of you would do well to keep that in mind when the protection expires. Follow WP:BRD. Pursue dispute resolution if needed, but remember, edit warring is always the wrong move. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:17, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I want to point out that the IP, as he admitted in his edit summary, was blindly reverting: he wasn't even looking into what was on the page to see that his edit had been incorporated, and, by way of consequence, that is simple (if weird) vandalism. In fact, it is also harassment, if he's reverting certain users just because he sees their names on the page. Dahn (talk) 19:27, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's because at first, the other mod. reverted my change with no reason (Biruitorul reverted my photo swap, for which I had a reason, and said 'this again?'). And I assumed he was reverting my change over and over just because he didn't agree with it, based on his (rather unprofessional, I'd add) answer. It's a simple case of lack of communication. (79.118.209.141 (talk) 18:40, 9 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]

File:Pitesti highrise 1970.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Pitesti highrise 1970.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests February 2012
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 23:05, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pitești. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:18, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pitești. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 9 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pitești. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:39, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Pitești. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]