Talk:Pointe shoe/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Matthew RD 17:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

I'm sorry to have to say this, but I'm going to have to quickfail this, per point 2 of the Good article criteria, that it's "Factually accurate and verifiable". Though there are two books as references, I see no footnotes, or citations (the [1], [2] etc you normally see in other good articles, that is what I am referring to). It does seem to be in decent shape, but until the citations are included, this is not good article material. -- Matthew RD 17:04, 10 October 2010 (UTC)