Talk:Pooja Gor

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 August 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers.

India: Television Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian television workgroup.

Title is inconsistent with first sentence

Title is inconsistent with first sentence... AnonMoos (talk) 20:13, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. There are two users (Sibeshmodak and an anon) who seem to be editing the articles and changing the name, the latter more than the former. I'd really like to change that back, but there does seem to be some usage of the other name (enough that there is a redirect at Pooja Gor) and I'm frankly not WP:BOLD enough. Arcendet (talk) 15:34, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also another anon, who might be the same person as the first anon. Arcendet (talk) 15:42, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've now tried to talk with Sibeshmodak and left messages for the anons; the anons have not responded and Sibeshmodak left one message on my talk stating that Gor is the correct spelling, and then blanked his talk. I'm thinking that, if it keeps getting reverted, it might be a good idea to get consensus on what the name should be. Arcendet (talk) 19:12, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Age

Are there any actual sources for her age? There are none linked, and when I tried to search for sources I found lots of answers, all different. One site listed her age as "not disclosed". I'll remove the age until we can find a source. All the best. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 13:12, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[1] See this vedio.In this vedio she is telling about age. User T284 —Preceding unsigned comment added by T284 (talk • contribs) 15:07, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I watched the first few minutes, but most of the time she is not speaking English, so it's quite hard to follow. Can you tell me the exact time in the video that she says her age? — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 15:17, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well it was 1 June 2010 and she was saying her age 19. —Preceding unsigned comment added by T284 (talk • contribs) 15:20, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No, I mean, in the video that you linked to, when does she say her age? At 0:46? 12:19? I want to know a time in minutes and seconds on the video. (And even if she says her age, she might be lying - she doesn't look 19 in that video). — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 15:31, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just before 3:39, she says she is 19. I'm not a great judge of age, but she could certainly be 19. She also said just before saying her age that she is the "youngest" person on the set. Absent a contradicting reliable source, her say-so should be good enough to put it in the article.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:53, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well-spotted! I did watch that far, but I still missed it. I agree, I think that's enough to put it in the article unless we find better sources. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 17:15, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know about reliability, but another source is here (I found it independently, but I now see it's in External links).--Bbb23 (talk) 17:27, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She is studying in college.(talk) 16:37, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

She is studying in second year B.COM in S.M.P.I.C college in Ahmedabad,Gujarat,India. T28T284 (talk) 16:39, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, ok, well she might just look old for her age. Do you have a source that says this? Remember, it must be reliable otherwise it can't be included in Wikipedia. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 16:48, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook link

I think having a link to Pooja Gaur's Facebook page in the very first paragraph of the article goes against Wikipedia's guidelines on external links (see WP:EL). It may be ok in the external links section, but even then I would rather not put it in. It would be much better to have a link to her official site, if she has one. Does anyone know of a suitable site to include? — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 14:08, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a Facebook link anywhere in the article - am I missing something? I see only the one link in EL, which purports to be her official website.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:06, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm talking about the one that T284 (talk · contribs) keeps introducing - it got reverted again. Here is the diff where it was added again most recently. I'm not sure if the TV Basti page is her official site, but I like it better than the Facebook link... — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 15:51, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks. It doesn't belong in the lead, and unless it can be shown to be authentic, doesn't belong in External links. If it can be authenticated, we'd have to make a judgment as to whether to include the Indian "official" site or the Facebook "official" site. Per WP:ELOFFICIAL, only one should be included unless both are needed because of their "unique content".--Bbb23 (talk) 16:16, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The facebook one being added doesn't look very official to me and doesn't add anything .. so .. this one( the Indian one? ) is a little better but not worthy of adding, its not like she is posting and bloging details there. Off2riorob (talk) 16:26, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that the second Facebook entry looks better than the first, although I still have no idea how to tell what's official. However, the Indian one is currently in EL here. I'm not familiar with Indian websites, but I don't think it's an official entry for her, just an entry, plus I think it adds little except the one-paragraph bio, which I think was used as the basis for the little substantive info that's in the article. Because the article has so little, I'd probably go for leaving the Indian one in EL and allowing the more official Facebook site to be added to EL if someone wants to. None of it, of course, belongs in the lead.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:40, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The User:T284 account has stuffed it back in the lede again - if I had a block button I would use it on his account. Off2riorob (talk) 12:37, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've filed a report at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:T284 reported by User:Mr. Stradivarius (Result: ). Let's wait and hear the result of that. — Mr. Stradivarius ^♫ 15:13, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]