Jump to content

Talk:Pro-feminism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Pro-feminist men)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bindawud03.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:14, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and archiving complete

[edit]

Thank you, Cailil, for your patience and your oversight. I think the two are fully merged and archived. If you wouldn't mind one more look, I'd really appreciate it. Thanks! Phyesalis (talk) 18:19, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Research on Male Feminism

[edit]

Hi,

I just wanted to make those interested in Male Feminism aware of my website www.Condorcet.info. I wrote my Master's thesis on Condorcet's feminism. I also addressed the perceived pro-feminism of other Enlightenment philosophers such as Thomas Paine, Diderot, Holbach, and Montesquieu. My thorough research comes up with important contradictions. I find that they were in fact quite misogynistic. The website is dedicated to this research. I also recently published a piece in the 2008 issue of the journal Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism, "Condorcet's Legacy Among the Philosophes and the Value of His Feminism for Today's Man." I hope my work can be of use.

Thanks, Jeff Nall —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.110.21.245 (talk) 03:34, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ideologies of the Men's Movement

[edit]

My master's thesis was on the "Ideologies of the Men's Movement."

The thesis is archived at the University of Missouri library as follows:

Author Williams, Larry S. Title Ideologies of the mens movement / by Larry S. Williams. Published 1989.

 Persistent record link: http://laurel.lso.missouri.edu/record=b2259020&searchscope=0

LOCATION CALL # STATUS

 MU DEPOSITORY 	 HM51.X1989 W55       	  NOT CHECKD OUT

Description vii, 102 leaves ; 28 cm. Note Typescript. Thesis (M.A.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 1989. Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-102). Subjects Men's studies. Feminism. Dissertations, Academic -- University of Missouri--Columbia -- Sociology. OCLC # 21920674 LC # lum90024975

It is also available on microform:

Author Williams, Larry S. Title Ideologies of the mens movement [microform] / by Larry S. Williams. Published 1989.

 Persistent record link: http://laurel.lso.missouri.edu/record=b2259019&searchscope=0

LOCATION CALL # STATUS

 MU ELLIS SPEC FILM 	 FILM BOOK 0001 1989 -161       	  LIB USE ONLY

Description vii, 102 leaves ; 28 cm. Note Typescript. Thesis (M.A.)--University of Missouri-Columbia, 1989. Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-102). Format Microfilm. Columbia, Mo. : University of Missouri-Columbia, 1990. Part of 1 microfilm reel ; 35 mm. Subjects Men's studies. Feminism. Dissertations, Academic -- University of Missouri--Columbia -- Sociology. OCLC # 21920687 LC # lum90024974


Link to the thesis can be found here: http://home.comcast.net/~sir.will.williams/site/


In addition to the thesis, I co-wrote a paper with Professor Clarence Y.H. Lo that was presented at the 1991 annual meeting of the American Sociological Association. This thesis began to utilize the theoretical perspective of Frames Analysis in social movements.

Either or both of these may use to contributors, reviewers, and/or readers of this topic.

I'm new to this talk feature, so please help me with protocol.

Larryswilliams (talk) 19:58, 20 July 2008 (UTC)Larry S Williams[reply]

2006 split, 2008 merge

[edit]

In 2006 this article was reduced with a lot of content going to Profeminism which was then moved Pro-feminist men.

In 2008 Pro-feminist men article was merged back here. The article is poorly referenced, by today's standards, but may include relevant information that has not survived.

All the best: Rich Farmbrough22:03, 6 November 2014 (UTC).

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pro-feminism. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-sex redirect

[edit]

Why should anti-sex redirect here? Is the word anti-sex used to refer to pro-feminism in English? --Yoramus (talk) 10:57, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It appears the redirect equates ant-sexist with anti-sex.-- DaKine (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Is it appropriate to add links within the content or only in External links, to particular profeminist men, such as their blog or other sites where their views are published? --PaulThePony (talk) 20:26, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]