Jump to content

Talk:Kalki 2898 AD

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Page semi-protected
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Project K (film))

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 August 2024 (3)

Plot: Krishna is the 9th avatar of Vishnu, not 8th. Wikipedian Yash (talk) 15:44, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Shadow311 (talk) 16:25, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor errors in Plot section

I do not have the extended confirmed user access level, but I noticed some minor grammatical errors in the Plot section of the article that could use fixing to make it clearer. For example: "Empowered by Karna's bow, and in trench like state" should most likely state "trance-like" instead of "trench like"

There are also some small mistakes with verb tense and noun plurality. For example: "Bhairava trick a rebel" should be "tricks a rebel" and "The Complex soldier overwhelm the Shambhalan army" should be "The Complex soldiers overwhelm the Shambhalan army".

In addition, perhaps paragraphs 3 and 4 should be switched, or at least the reference to Sumathi should be moved to paragraph 4 since she is mentioned in paragraph 3 without a prior introduction to her character.

Hope this can help. ElmoFromSpace (talk) 23:05, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Needs to be fixed. Kkvishnu (talk) 06:06, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Box office

Request to change box office 1100 cr to 1200 cr 103.167.229.248 (talk) 04:20, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

103.167.229.248, Source? Please read the red edit notice box above. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mistakes in Plot

There is a typo in Plot of this page. Word 'trench' has to be replaced with 'trance'. Kkvishnu (talk) 06:07, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Done NotAGenious (talk) 13:05, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kalki 2898ad Crossed 1,200 core update request

it,s official it crossed 1,200 core https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/news/indian-box-office-nets-5000-cr-kalki-pulls-in-15/article68409273.ece Aptharital (talk) 07:19, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Aptharital, nowhere in the reference does it say Kalki grossed 1200 crores. That figure is the total gross of Indian movies for the month of June. Thanks. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 16:32, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think keeping a wide range of box office of over 100 cr in isn't making any sense. better keep a figure of under 1200 cr as box office and any way all figures are in estimates Bonadart (talk) 09:32, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bonadart, Why not? When two reliable sources publish two figures, we keep a range. It's justified since Wikipedia is a secondary source that uses other reliable sources as references. We have had movies with ranges of millions. It's always easy to go with the range rather than choosing a lower limit. It won't make sense if we start ignoring a specific reliable established source. That goes against WP:VERIFY and WP:RS, and esp the guidelines of WP:ICTF and the larger WikiProject Film. In this case, there are 4 well established RS that are publishing such figures. We can't ignore that. Thanks. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:46, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changing BO range request.

Could we adjust the range to 1090 - 1200 crore, using Box Office Mojo as the Base reference. An article from variety and collider also confirms same. Given that some articles cited currently mention "over 1100 crore" and some even mention 1200 crore please update the range accordingly.

Mentions 1200 crore: https://www.republicworld.com/entertainment/telugu-cinema/kalki-2898-ad-on-ott-negative-reviews-of-prabhas-performance-viral-after-arshad-warsi-s-joker-comment

https://telugu.hindustantimes.com/entertainment/kalki-2898-ad-ott-streaming-prabhas-starrer-top-1-trending-movie-in-prime-video-within-hours-of-its-digital-premier-121724389520641.html#google_vignette

https://english.jagran.com/entertainment/kalki-2898-ad-ott-release-runtime-of-prabhas-movie-shortened-with-these-major-cuts-netflix-prime-video-10182482

https://www.asianetnews.com/entertainment-news/kalki-2898-ad-ott-release-date-buzz-vvk-si4x3t

https://telugu.news18.com/photogallery/movies/kalki-latest-ott-update-bh-2554217.html

https://www.india.com/entertainment/kalki-2898-ad-ott-release-prabhas-and-deepika-padukones-film-to-stream-on-two-different-platforms-check-date-here-7172517/ Meowedits (talk) 05:57, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@The Herald (Benison) please look into this put range Aptharital (talk) 03:35, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I believe you have tagged a wrong user ID. Please recheck and tag the appropriate user ID or any other users who have access to edit the page. Meowedits (talk) 07:15, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Meowedits, this is on my watchlist but I was busy to check the sources. Either I'll check the sources and add them if passed, or someone else shall. Please wait till then. PS: Wikipedia doesn't have a deadline. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 09:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies! The user ID that was tagged led to an unregistered user page, so I responded accordingly, assuming it might have been a typo. However, please take your time to review. Thanks. Meowedits (talk) 16:26, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I think keeping a wide range of box office of over 100 cr in isn't making any sense. better keep a figure of under 1200 cr as box office and any way all figures are in estimates Bonadart (talk) 03:02, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Already done The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:41, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bonadart, Your query has been answered above. — The Herald (Benison) (talk) 02:47, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
hi thanks for resolving the kalki BO issue,
btw i need 1 more help from you, in katrina kaif page/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katrina_Kaif; the 'personal life' and 'early life and family' as per me should be together but it has been separated by career section, which i think isnt proper and 'personal life' and 'early life and family' should be together. even heer husbands bio has similar issue. I had tried to correct it but another editor reverted it saying i need to start a discussion in her talk page, i seek your opinion on if 'personal life' and 'early life and family' should be kept together or not. Bonadart (talk) 08:09, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]