Talk:Queensway, Hong Kong

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Queensway, Hong Kong article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Hong Kong: Transport Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the Hong Kong Transport workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Hong Kong To-do:

Attention needed (60)

...needing expert attention (4) • ...without infoboxes (21)

Collaboration needed

Recommend topic

Improvement needed

GA-Class articles (60) • B-Class articles (291)

Cleanup needed

C-Class articles (1,053)

Image needed (348)

Destub needed

Start-Class articles (5,473) • Stub-Class articles (6,692)

Deorphan needed

...orphans

Page creation needed

Requested articles

Miscellaneous tasks

...maintain popularity • ...assess the un-Class (388) • ...assess the un-Importance (1,340)

Highways: Hong Kong Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Roads portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on the project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hong Kong Roads Task Force.
	This article's junction list has been marked as needing attention.

Untitled

This road is only one section of a larger road. There was only one sentence unique to this article. I've merged that sentence to Queen's Road and redirected this article there. SchmuckyTheCat 09:48, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They are, legally speaking, four roads. The Queensway, in particular, does not share part of its name like the other three do. — Insta ntnood 19:20, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is one road. That they are called "Way, Central, East, West" is irrelevant. This one sentence stub article does not contain any information that can't be in Queen's Road. See that talk page for more details of why. SchmuckyTheCat 21:24, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've got their Chinese names, don't you? — Insta ntnood 18:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I've put the merge template on this page to put this content back into Queen's Road. This article will never be more than a stub and has more context and history within the article on the longer road that it is a part of. SchmuckyTheCat 17:26, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Article size says,

A rule of thumb.

Some useful rules of thumb for splitting articles, and combining small pages (tables, list-like sections and markup excluded):

<1K - If an article or list has remained this size for over a couple of months, consider combining it with a related page; this does not apply to a redirect or disambiguation page. Alternatively, why not fix it by adding more info? See Wikipedia:Stub. If it's a really important article that's just too short, put it under COTW, a project to improve stubs or nonexistent articles.

Please discuss at talk:Queen's Road. — Insta ntnood 19:41, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Queensway Road

[1] or heck, [2] SchmuckyTheCat 18:29, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why the name changed in 1967?

What made Hong Kong Government change both English and Chinese names in 1967? — HenryLi (Talk)

See next section Onanoff (talk) 06:14, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Date of creation of road - 1967 or earlier?

The assertion of the road's sectioning from Queen's Road East in 1967 is unreferenced. Neither was it much mentioned in the lively discussion on whether Queensway should be part of a single Queen's Road article[3], but it may all rely on two dodgy references from a bulletin board [4] and [5]. Also see Chinese page. Unfortunately Legco records are only online back to 1970 (Google with site:legco.gov.hk/yr70-71) and I can't find any other mention of the creation of Queensway in the years up to 1967. Except this one reference from 1970 to "Queensway was reconstructed some 18 or 20 years ago". Does that imply that the name was created (or already existed) in 1950 or 1952, or was the legislator (three years after QW was carved out of QRE) referring to physical work done on what was at the time QR or QRE? This issue is central to this article and needs to be looked into and sorted out. We need a reference! Onanoff (talk) 06:14, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong Government Gazette is the authoritative source. Newpaper is also a good source. — HenryLi (Talk) 00:41, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Henry. I haven't checked the Gazette specifically, but it didn't come up online.

But Gwulo has a map from 1964 showing Queensway, with the comment the name changed within the period 1939-1964. So I've removed the reference to 1967 from the article, pending confirmation. Onanoff (talk) 06:09, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queensway (Hong Kong). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060104172846/http://www.fso-tela.gov.hk:80/gui/guide_to_filming_06_01.cfm to http://www.fso-tela.gov.hk/gui/guide_to_filming_06_01.cfm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]