Talk:Skylon (spacecraft)/GA1
Appearance
(Redirected from Talk:Reaction Engines Skylon/GA1)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 01:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.
Disambiguations: Two found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 01:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Linkrot: None found. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:30, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- Once operative, Skylon could potentially lower satellite costs from the current £15,000/kg to £650/kg, according to the UK parliament. This is not strictly speaking true, should read "according to evidence supplied to the UK parliament by Reaction Engines Limited" I have changed this.
- Otherwise well written, according sufficiently with the MoS.
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- References check out, sources are RS, no evidence of OR.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Sufficient detail, without unnecessary trivia.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Tagged , captioned and licensed.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I am happy that this meets the the good article criteria, so I am happy to list it. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 01:47, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: