Talk:Same-sex marriage in Colombia

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Colombia: One Bogota notary office, a hundred same-sex partnership registrations

Colombia: Senate rejects same-sex partnership bill AGAIN; gay-friendly Notary Public shot to death in Bogota (October 11, 2008)

—Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.12.171.218 (talk) 19:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Senate to vote next week?[edit]

Apparently, the Colombian senate is going to vote on SSM on April 23rd: Colombia's Senate postpones gay marriage vote. Ben Gershon - בן גרשון (Talk) 16:20, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gachetá marriage[edit]

Apparently, a civil court judge has ordered the recognition of a marriage between two women in Gachetá. The wedding was held secretly on September 25, but the couple has since come forward and announced their union publicly.

Article in Spanish from El Espectador newspaper: [1]

Blog post in English that, though not authoritative, provides useful background and context to events in Colombia leading up to this ceremony: [2] Fortguy (talk) 16:48, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Marriage annulled[edit]

A Bogotá court has annulled a marriage ruling that there is no constitutional basis for same-sex marriage. Link: [3] Fortguy (talk) 16:44, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 April 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Jenks24 (talk) 16:17, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Recognition of same-sex unions in ColombiaSame-sex marriage in Colombia – In accordance with similar articles, when SSM becomes legally recognised in a country the wiki article title usually becomes 'Same-sex marriage in [name of country]. Jono52795 (talk) 14:05, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fully Support, I think we need an admin move over top of this redirect since it has more than just the one simple edit though.Naraht (talk) 14:13, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.