Talk:The Hurricane and Rosey/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 02:24, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail:
Very minor stuff, but I'd like if you could do quick source check to see if you can expand on some details of the duo.--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 02:24, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This is really all the info. available for the team. If there was more, believe me it would be included in the article. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 18:26, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yep, we really used all the avaliable info from the sources in the article. ♥NiciVampireHeart♥ 16:13, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm now passing the article, nice work on this.--Giants27(Contribs|WP:CFL) 20:34, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]