Jump to content

Talk:SMS Salamander (1861)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · contribs) 02:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Will come back shortly. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Section 1; para 1; There are many consistency errors in the the para and the infobox. Here goes the list:
Parameter Prose Infobox
Length 70.1 meters (230 ft 0 in) 62.78 m (206 ft 0 in)
Beam 14 meters (45 ft 11 in) 13.94 m (45 ft 9 in)
Draft 6.8 meters (22 ft 4 in) 6.3 m (20 ft 8 in)
Displacement 2,824 long tons 2,707 long tons
Indicated HP 1,540 kW 1,374 kW
Speed 10.5 knots (19.4 km/h; 12.1 mph) 11 knots (20 km/h; 13 mph)
Please correct these. And also mostly in many of other ship articles of Austia-Hungary (mostly done by you), used the displcament format as XXX tons (XXX long tons; XXX short tons). Please consider the same here.
Should all be fixed - another editor wrote up the design section and infobox, and their stuff is usually pretty squared away, so I didn't really look at it closely.
  • Section 2; sentence 1; Explain about Drache on its first mention i.e it is the sister ship, than in the later sentence.
    • Fixed
  • Section 2; sentence 2; Remove the dup-link of Drache
    • Done
  • Section 2; A comma (,) after "to protect Austria's coastline"
    • Added
  • Section 2; Link "Denmark"
    • Done
  • Section 2.1; para 3; sentence 1; "By this time, Re d'Italia had been rammed and sunk and the coastal defense ship Palestro was burning", the use of "and" is a bit confusing, revise.
    • Removed the "rammed and", which should hopefully clear it up a bit
  • Section 2.2; para 1; Remove thedup-link of Venice. First linked in para 1 of Section 2.1
    • Done
  • Consider adding the information about guns refitted around 1867 to the infobox.
    • Added
  • Consistency error between lead, prose, and infobox. The year for "broken-up", in the lead it is 1896, in prose (section 2.2) it is 1895–1896, and in infobox it is 1895. Please correct them.
    • Good catch, fixed.
Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 02:20, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks again! Parsecboy (talk) 13:07, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 00:29, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]