Jump to content

Talk:Sally Dynevor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Sally Whittaker)
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Sally Dynevor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

[edit]

Interesting to see that Sally has the tag Category: Labour Party (UK) people, although I see no evidence for this anywhere.--TrottieTrue (talk) 01:33, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@TrottieTrue: Strange. I've removed it since this is the closest I could find lol. – DarkGlow (contribstalk) 01:42, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks - yes, probably best to remove it. That was one of the only references to Labour I found when searching, but has nothing to do with Dynevor's party support. I think the fact that categories do not require references means they can easily slip through the net. It may well be true, but there's no source for it.--TrottieTrue (talk) 01:48, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]